Former President Donald Trump Seeks to Overturn Gag Order Ahead of 2020 Election Trial
Introduction
Former President Donald Trump is once again attempting to remove the partial gag order imposed on him before his federal 2020 election trial. Trump’s attorneys have asked the full DC Circuit Court of Appeals to review the matter, arguing that the order was upheld based on faulty legal reasoning.
Restrictions Narrowed but Still in Place
The restrictions imposed by US District Judge Tanya Chutkan were recently narrowed by a three-judge appeals panel. However, Trump is still prohibited from making rhetorical attacks on known or “reasonably foreseeable” witnesses in the case.
Legal Arguments
In his filing, Trump’s lawyer John Sauer argued that the first appeals decision overlooked and misapprehended points of law and mischaracterized Trump’s statements. Sauer also contended that the judges downplayed the significance of Trump’s 2024 campaign and claimed that prosecutors lacked proof of threats or harassment related to the order.
Threats Against Judge Chutkan
Judge Tanya Chutkan herself has faced threats in connection with the Trump case. Despite this, she is scheduled to preside over the trial in March of next year.
First Amendment Rights
Sauer emphasized that the panel opinion disregarded the fact that Trump is the leading candidate for President and relied heavily on the anticipated reaction of the audience to his speech. He argued that public speakers should not be held responsible for potential disorder or violence resulting from their words under the First Amendment.
Supreme Court Appeal
After Judge Chutkan rejected Trump’s claim of presidential immunity, his legal team appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is currently considering whether to take up the challenge.
Special Counsel’s Request
Special counsel Jack Smith has asked the Supreme Court to rule on the matter quickly in order to keep the trial on track for its scheduled start date of March 4.
Implications of Separate Case
The Supreme Court recently announced plans to hear a separate case related to the Capitol riots on January 6, 2021. This case could have significant implications for Trump’s federal election indictment, particularly regarding the charge of obstruction of an official proceeding.
First Amendment Challenge in Georgia Election Subversion Case
Trump is also mounting a First Amendment challenge in the 2020 Georgia election subversion case, where he is facing 13 counts. Despite these legal battles, Trump remains the frontrunner for the GOP presidential nomination in 2024.