Researchers Highlight the Need to Protect Digital ID Against ‘Mission Creep’

In a recent submission to the Senate inquiry, independent scholars from the UNSW Allens Hub have emphasized the need for safeguards against “mission creep” in Australia’s proposed digital identity bill. The researchers highlighted potential issues with the expansion of the system, stating that similar systems in India and China eventually placed civil liberties at risk. The Digital ID Bill 2023 aims to establish a legislative framework for a digital ID that can connect individuals to government services and eventually businesses. While Australians can already voluntarily opt into a digital ID system for certain services, the proposed legislation broadens its scope to include other federal departments, state and territory governments, and the private sector.

The scholars at the Allens Hub argued for additional safeguards to protect against mission creep in the future. They pointed out that the ecosystem surrounding digital identity could eventually make it the de facto system of use, even though it is initially voluntary. They cited examples from other countries, such as India and China, where similar systems started as voluntary but soon became heavily relied upon for various purposes, raising concerns about civil liberties and democratic practices. The scholars cautioned against a creeping expansion of businesses that could undermine the voluntary nature of the digital identity system, potentially leading to anxieties of recognition and exclusion.

Furthermore, the researchers recommended against relying on biometric technology for identity verification under the digital identity system. They argued that the promise of accurate verification through biometrics remains largely unverified and untested. Instead, they suggested exploring alternative methods to ensure secure and reliable identity verification.

The Senate Economics Legislation Committee is currently investigating Australia’s digital ID system. The committee received 97 submissions and is set to report back on the legislation on February 28th. Major corporations like Woolworths and major banks, including National Australia Bank (NAB) and Westpac, have expressed support for the digital ID system. However, non-profit advocacy group Digital Rights Watch has cautioned against potential surveillance or law enforcement use of the system, emphasizing the importance of maintaining public trust in these systems.

Australian federal Finance Minister Senator Katy Gallagher defended the digital identity bill, stating that it aims to streamline government operations and reduce cyber risks. She emphasized that the system is voluntary and individuals have control over the information they provide for identity verification. However, One Nation Senator Malcolm Roberts raised concerns about the bill, arguing that it will tie every Australian to a digital identity that may compromise their privacy and increase the risk of hacking.

As the debate around Australia’s digital identity bill continues, it is crucial to strike a balance between convenience and safeguarding civil liberties. While the benefits of a streamlined digital ID system are evident, measures must be in place to prevent mission creep and protect against potential privacy breaches. Additionally, alternative methods of identity verification should be explored to ensure accuracy and reliability. As the Senate inquiry progresses, it remains to be seen how the legislation will address these concerns and shape Australia’s digital identity landscape.