Demonstrators gathered in front of a federal building, protected by U.S. Marines and National Guards, during the “No Kings” protest on July 4, 2025, in Los Angeles. This event marked a significant moment in the ongoing struggle for civil rights and constitutional freedoms in the United States, as millions of Americans prepared to voice their dissent against what they perceive as an unconstitutional and authoritarian agenda.
In the lead-up to these protests, prominent figures within the GOP, including House Speaker Mike Johnson and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, began to frame the demonstrations in a negative light. Instead of acknowledging the protests as First Amendment-protected expressions of dissent, they labeled them as “Hate America” rallies, filled with “terrorists” and “Soros-funded” elements. This narrative appears to be a strategic attempt to undermine the legitimacy of the protests before they even began, painting a picture of dissenters as radical extremists rather than ordinary citizens standing up for their rights.
The “No Kings” protests are anticipated to be among the largest in U.S. history, with events planned in every state and millions expected to participate. Organizers aim to highlight the perceived illegality and immorality of the current administration’s policies, which many see as a direct threat to hard-won civil rights. The GOP’s preemptive framing of these protests as a threat to national security reflects a deep-seated fear of mass mobilization. As former Republican Joe Walsh pointed out, the party seems “scared to death” of the impending demonstrations, which could showcase a united front against the MAGA agenda.
The power of images and visible dissent cannot be understated. Even smaller protests have effectively countered the narrative of a violent opposition. For instance, inflatable frog demonstrations against ICE in Oregon resonated widely, challenging the portrayal of Portland as a city under siege. The upcoming “No Kings” rallies promise to amplify this effect, providing a stark visual representation of the widespread opposition to authoritarianism and the everyday Americans who are standing up for their rights.
Mass protests serve not only to galvanize public opinion but also to influence key institutions and decision-makers. Research by political scientists Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan reveals that once 3.5% of a population engages in sustained nonviolent protest, authoritarian regimes struggle to maintain control. This suggests that the “No Kings” protests could significantly impact the administration’s ability to enforce its agenda, as visible dissent signals deeper societal opposition.
Historically, mass protests have been pivotal in shaping public opinion and driving democratic advances. The civil rights movement, the push for women’s suffrage, and the recent protests for racial justice all illustrate how collective action can shift societal norms and political landscapes. Sociologist Charles Tilly identified key elements that contribute to the success of such movements: worthiness, unity, numbers, commitment, and diversity. The upcoming protests embody these qualities, presenting a formidable challenge to the current regime.
However, the administration is acutely aware of the potential impact of these protests. In response, it has begun to implement strategies to undermine organized dissent. White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller has been at the forefront of efforts to label opposition as domestic terrorism, seeking to criminalize dissent and dismantle civil society organizations that facilitate mobilization. Recent legislative proposals aim to enable the government to target groups that support public protests, further stifling free expression.
This moment represents a critical juncture for American democracy. The “No Kings” protests could serve as a tipping point, galvanizing public support against the administration’s authoritarian tendencies. As the nation stands at this crossroads, it is essential for the media and the public to recognize the significance of these demonstrations. They are not merely protests; they are a vital expression of the collective will to uphold democratic values and civil rights.
In conclusion, participating in the “No Kings” protests is not just an act of dissent; it is a crucial step toward safeguarding the future of democracy in the United States. As millions prepare to take to the streets, the message is clear: visible opposition is essential in the fight against authoritarianism. Whether or not one agrees with every aspect of the movement, the importance of standing up for civil liberties and constitutional rights cannot be overstated. The time to act is now.
