In the realm of investigative journalism, few figures have navigated the murky waters of American power as tenaciously as James Risen. A Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, Risen has spent nearly two decades exposing the underbelly of government secrecy and corruption. His commitment to protecting sources has not only defined his career but has also placed him at the forefront of the battle for press freedom, culminating in a grueling seven-year confrontation with federal authorities that could have led to his imprisonment.
As Risen approaches retirement, he reflects on his remarkable journey in a recent episode of a podcast, where he engages in a candid discussion with David Bralow, The Intercept’s general counsel and a longtime friend. This conversation serves as a poignant reminder of the challenges that journalists face in an increasingly hostile environment, particularly under the shadow of former President Donald Trump.
Risen has been vocal about the threats posed by Trump’s administration, particularly concerning the erosion of democratic norms. He is currently working on a book that delves into the rise of Christian nationalism and extremism in the United States. In his view, the implications of these movements are dire. “Trump has appointed a bunch of lunatics and conspiracy theorists to positions of power and he’s turned the government over to oligarchs,” Risen warns. “I think it’s gonna get bad really, really fast.” This sentiment resonates with many experts who have observed a troubling trend: the normalization of extremist ideologies within mainstream politics.
One of the most pressing issues Risen highlights is the precarious position of journalists today. He argues that the legal landscape has shifted dramatically, making it easier for the wealthy and powerful to weaponize libel laws against news organizations. “The wealthy can now use libel law against the press endlessly, not to try to win cases, but just to financially exhaust news organizations,” he explains. This tactic, often referred to as “strategic lawsuits against public participation” (SLAPP), has become a favored tool for silencing dissent and stifling investigative reporting.
Recent studies corroborate Risen’s concerns, indicating a marked increase in frivolous lawsuits aimed at media outlets. According to a report from the Committee to Protect Journalists, the number of legal threats against journalists has surged in recent years, creating a chilling effect that stifles free expression. The implications are profound: as news organizations grapple with the financial burden of defending against baseless claims, the quality and quantity of investigative journalism may suffer, leaving the public less informed about critical issues.
In this context, Risen’s reflections serve as a clarion call for the media and the public alike. The challenges facing journalism are not merely about individual reporters or publications; they are about the very fabric of democracy. As Risen aptly puts it, “In most libel cases brought against news organizations, the other side almost never really cares about winning. What they want to do is impose large costs on news organizations to defend against frivolous libel suits.” This strategy not only threatens the viability of news outlets but also undermines the public’s right to know.
As Risen prepares to step away from the front lines of journalism, his insights remain crucial for understanding the current media landscape. The battle for press freedom is far from over, and the stakes have never been higher. For those who care about the future of democracy, supporting robust journalism is essential. Engaging with the work of fearless reporters like Risen, and advocating for legal protections for the press, are vital steps in ensuring that the truth continues to shine through the shadows of power.
To explore more of Risen’s thoughts and the broader implications of his work, listeners can tune into the latest episode of the podcast, where these pressing issues are discussed in depth.
