Concerns Raised Over Impartiality of Texas Ranger on Independent Panel Reviewing HPD
Houston, Texas – In an effort to ensure transparency and accountability, the Houston Police Department (HPD) announced the formation of a five-person independent panel to review over a quarter million suspended incident reports. However, concerns have been raised regarding the impartiality of one of the panel members, Texas Ranger Jeff Owles.
City leaders, including HPD Chief Troy Finner and Houston Mayor John Whitmire, have emphasized the importance of transparency throughout this process. They have promised to provide accurate information to victims and the public. To fulfill this commitment, the independent panel was established, consisting of former councilwoman and state Rep. Ellen Cohen, city attorney Arturo Michel, Houston deputy inspector general Christina Nowak, Harris County Sheriff’s Chaplain Leon Preston, and Texas Ranger Jeff Owles.
However, questions have arisen about the impartiality of the panel members. Eyewitness News attempted to contact Owles and Reverend Preston for comment but received no response. Meanwhile, Nowak and Michel were asked by the mayor’s office not to speak with journalists. The only panel member who has spoken so far is Cohen, who expressed her confidence in the panel’s ability to represent a cross-section of the city.
One expert, University of Houston-Clear Lake criminology professor Kimberly Dodson, expressed reservations about the composition of the panel. Dodson, who has previously worked on similar independent panels outside of Texas, highlighted the importance of diversity and inclusivity in citizen review committees. She suggested that a committee of only five members may lack the broad range of perspectives necessary for a thorough investigation.
Dodson also raised concerns about the presence of a current law enforcement member on the panel, citing potential bias due to officers’ familiarity with each other. Additionally, she questioned the inclusion of the city attorney, suggesting that their role may prioritize protecting the city rather than impartial review.
Another point of concern is the panel’s limited powers. When asked about the panel’s ability to subpoena and depose individuals or conduct computer audits, Mayor Whitmire stated that this was not a criminal investigation but rather a data collection exercise. Dodson argued that without these powers, the panel may struggle to gather the necessary information for a comprehensive investigation.
In response to these concerns, a spokesperson from the mayor’s office emphasized the credibility and diverse backgrounds of the panel members, stating that they are responsible for providing answers and accountability to the public.
While the intention behind the independent panel is commendable, it is crucial to address concerns regarding impartiality and investigative powers. In order to restore public trust and confidence in the review process, ensuring a diverse and inclusive panel with sufficient investigative authority may be necessary. Transparency and accountability must remain at the forefront to deliver justice for victims and maintain public confidence in the Houston Police Department.
