The second and final debate of New York City’s mayoral race provided a dramatic showcase of the candidates’ contrasting styles and visions for the city, as they made their last pitches to voters ahead of the crucial November 4 election. The event, held at LaGuardia Community College on October 22, 2025, featured Democratic candidate Zohran Mamdani, Republican Curtis Sliwa, and former Governor Andrew Cuomo, now running as an independent. Tensions were palpable as the candidates clashed over their qualifications, policy proposals, and their ability to navigate a complex political landscape, including their potential interactions with President Trump.
One of the standout moments came when Cuomo and Sliwa, despite their ongoing rivalry, momentarily united to critique Mamdani’s reluctance to engage with specific housing proposals that will be on the ballot. Sliwa’s quip, “Don’t be a politician,” underscored the frustration many voters feel towards candidates who evade direct answers. Mamdani’s hesitation to take a clear stance on significant issues—four out of six questions on the ballot relate to housing—was seen as a potential vulnerability. This hesitance is particularly notable given the pressing need for affordable housing in New York City, where over 60% of renters are cost-burdened, according to recent studies by the NYC Department of Housing Preservation and Development.
Sliwa, fighting from a distant third in the polls, seized the opportunity to criticize both rivals, stating, “Your resume could fit on a cocktail napkin,” aimed at Mamdani, while simultaneously lambasting Cuomo’s tenure. His comments not only highlighted the lack of substantial experience on the part of the younger candidate but also reflected a broader concern among voters about leadership credibility in times of crisis.
In a particularly poignant exchange, Mamdani confronted Cuomo about his past sexual harassment allegations, bringing forth Charlotte Bennett, a former state staffer whose accusations against Cuomo made headlines in 2021. Mamdani’s direct challenge—asking Cuomo what he would say to the women he allegedly harassed—left the former governor visibly shaken. It was a stark reminder of the shadows cast by Cuomo’s controversial exit from office and the necessity for accountability in leadership. Cuomo’s response, framing Mamdani as immature, failed to address the gravity of the allegations and only intensified scrutiny surrounding his candidacy.
Sliwa took the opportunity to further slam Cuomo, saying, “You fled from being impeached by the Democrats in the state legislature!” This comment resonated with the audience, echoing public sentiment regarding Cuomo’s tumultuous political legacy. In fact, a 2021 report from the State Attorney General’s office corroborated the claims of multiple women, revealing a toxic work environment during Cuomo’s administration. Such issues are critical not just for the candidates but for voters who are seeking a leader who can restore trust in city governance.
As the debate progressed, the candidates were asked about their potential working relationship with the White House. Cuomo dismissed Mamdani’s capability, stating that Trump would see him as a “kid” and would “knock him on his tuchus.” This comment reflected Cuomo’s belief in the necessity of a combative stance when dealing with federal authorities, which could be vital for securing federal support for city initiatives. However, Mamdani countered by labeling Cuomo as Trump’s “puppet,” suggesting a lack of independence that could hinder New Yorkers’ interests.
The election on November 4 is pivotal not only for the candidates but for the future direction of New York City. With early voting beginning shortly, the candidates must now galvanize their bases and address the pressing concerns of New Yorkers, particularly in the realms of public safety, housing, and education. As the debate highlighted, the path to the mayor’s office is fraught with challenges, but it also represents an opportunity for renewal and reform in a city that is eager for leadership capable of rising above past controversies.
