Most of the world agrees that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories must come to an end, as evidenced by the historic resolution passed by the United Nations. Out of the 181 member states, 124 voted in favor of the measure, while the United States and 13 other nations voted against it. This highlights the unconditional support that the U.S. continues to provide for Israel’s actions in Palestine.
The resolution builds upon a significant ruling from the International Court of Justice, which declared Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories as an illegal, apartheid system. The latest resolution affirms this ruling and sets a 12-month timeframe for the withdrawal of Israeli military from the Occupied Palestinian Territory. It also calls for the removal of Israeli settlers, a halt to Israel’s annexation of Palestinian land, and the return of seized land. This resolution is a crucial step towards ending the occupation and upholding international law.
While the majority of nations supported the resolution, some countries, including the United States, expressed concerns about its scope. They argued that the 12-month timeframe for ending the occupation is unrealistic and that Israel needs to be a more significant negotiating partner. However, this opposition overlooks the urgency of the situation and the need for a clear deadline. The U.N.’s recognition of Israel as an occupying power is accurate, and the 12-month timeframe provides a necessary sense of urgency.
It is important to note that the U.N. resolution, like the court’s ruling, is not legally binding, and the U.N. lacks the means to enforce its rulings. Therefore, it is up to other member states in the international community to put pressure on Israel and its allies to comply with the resolution. This can be done through vocal support for ending the occupation, withholding military aid, and imposing sanctions. The United States, in particular, plays a significant role as it provides billions of dollars in military aid to Israel each year.
The U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., Linda Thomas-Greenfield, has expressed concerns about the resolution undermining efforts to negotiate a two-state solution. However, the Biden administration, like previous administrations, has yet to present a viable path towards achieving Palestinian sovereignty and a two-state solution. This lack of progress further complicates the prospects for Palestinian statehood.
Despite the opposition and concerns raised, the U.N. resolution and its 12-month timeframe provide a necessary deadline for Israel to take action. It allows the international community to assess Israel’s behavior and determine whether it has fulfilled the recommendations set forth in the resolution.
Human rights groups have also voiced their support for the resolution and called for an end to weapons sales and transfers to Israel. They have highlighted numerous violations of humanitarian law, including attacks on Palestinian civilians, arbitrary imprisonment, and the deprivation of freedom of movement and medical assistance. Adhering to the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion is crucial to upholding international law and reinforcing the commitment to international institutions.
In conclusion, the United Nations’ resolution calling for the end of Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories has garnered significant support from the international community. While the U.S. and a few other nations oppose the resolution, it is essential to recognize the urgency of the situation and the need for a clear deadline. The resolution, although not legally binding, provides a framework for holding Israel accountable and pushing for the end of the occupation. It is now up to other member states to exert pressure on Israel and work towards a just and lasting solution in Palestine.
